Naoya (
crouching_sin) wrote2015-03-10 03:11 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
[Anon] [Text]
Here's a question for you all. It's something that I read a while back, and I'm interested in your answers. Anonymous is fine, if you want.
There are five patients in a hospital. All of them are dying due to complications with various organs. All of them will die within the next day or so if they don't get an organ transplant. Magic won't save any of them, incidentally, if you were hoping to use that.
A young backpacker comes into the hospital or a checkup. He has no relatives, and he is in excellent health. As it happens, you, the surgeon on duty, notice that he is a perfect match for all five of the patients.
Assuming the backpacker does not give consent, is it morally permissible to cut him up and transfer the organs to the other patients? These are not organs that the backpacker can live without, so he'll die if you do.
I'm interested to hear what you think.
There are five patients in a hospital. All of them are dying due to complications with various organs. All of them will die within the next day or so if they don't get an organ transplant. Magic won't save any of them, incidentally, if you were hoping to use that.
A young backpacker comes into the hospital or a checkup. He has no relatives, and he is in excellent health. As it happens, you, the surgeon on duty, notice that he is a perfect match for all five of the patients.
Assuming the backpacker does not give consent, is it morally permissible to cut him up and transfer the organs to the other patients? These are not organs that the backpacker can live without, so he'll die if you do.
I'm interested to hear what you think.
anon text forever;
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I guess if you really want an answer to whatever went wrong with you today, it's obviously not morally permissible but that doesn't mean it's not an option. If a surgeon doesn't have consent to do it but is actually considering it anyway, I'm pretty sure morals are already so far off the table it's not even a point anymore.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Lesser considerations are how much I care about the five people whose organs are failing, or if they're random.
no subject
no subject
[...Jinnai, I'm pretty sure they don't.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
More realistically though, it's unlikely to ever work, unless everything went perfectly. And there's definitely the risk that the organs would go bad by the time he got to the fifth patient anyway, since he's not likely to want other people around to help him. People talk, after all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't think it really matters whether one is better or not, personally.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)