crouching_sin: (you'll be pleadin' while you're bleedin')
Naoya ([personal profile] crouching_sin) wrote2015-03-10 03:11 pm

[Anon] [Text]

Here's a question for you all. It's something that I read a while back, and I'm interested in your answers. Anonymous is fine, if you want.

There are five patients in a hospital. All of them are dying due to complications with various organs. All of them will die within the next day or so if they don't get an organ transplant. Magic won't save any of them, incidentally, if you were hoping to use that.

A young backpacker comes into the hospital or a checkup. He has no relatives, and he is in excellent health. As it happens, you, the surgeon on duty, notice that he is a perfect match for all five of the patients.

Assuming the backpacker does not give consent, is it morally permissible to cut him up and transfer the organs to the other patients? These are not organs that the backpacker can live without, so he'll die if you do.

I'm interested to hear what you think.
conquersworlds: (INQUIRE ✯ and who the hell asked you)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
And that exempts the asker from criticism for posing it in the first place?
conquersworlds: (WHY ✯ so i just stab her in the rear?)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
...You know, my teachers are actually really bad examples for this, you might want to try using another rhetorical question to try to pointlessly assert yourself.
conquersworlds: (LECTURE ✯ that's what she said)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Something like that.

I guess if you really want an answer to whatever went wrong with you today, it's obviously not morally permissible but that doesn't mean it's not an option. If a surgeon doesn't have consent to do it but is actually considering it anyway, I'm pretty sure morals are already so far off the table it's not even a point anymore.
conquersworlds: (HMM ✯ that's some majora's mask shit)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
It...depends, I think.
conquersworlds: (INQUIRE ✯ and who the hell asked you)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
There's someone I really want to see dead. If he were our backpacker, I wouldn't think twice.

Lesser considerations are how much I care about the five people whose organs are failing, or if they're random.
conquersworlds: (CLEVER ✯ i'm ruler of shinonome high)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure everyone thinks that about somebody.

[...Jinnai, I'm pretty sure they don't.]
conquersworlds: (LECTURE ✯ that's what she said)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
So. Are you going to share your thoughts on the matter or not?
conquersworlds: (HMM ✯ that's some majora's mask shit)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
How isn't that wrong, in your opinion? Because it spares five instead of one?
conquersworlds: (INQUIRE ✯ and who the hell asked you)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
...Do you want to point out where murder fits into the job description as well or just try again? Your choice.
conquersworlds: (WHY ✯ so i just stab her in the rear?)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
...I think the answer most people would give here is something like "Yes, because then you don't have a direct hand in the death."
conquersworlds: (HMM ✯ that's some majora's mask shit)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
Or they just have different priorities.

I don't think it really matters whether one is better or not, personally.
conquersworlds: (CLEVER ✯ i'm ruler of shinonome high)

[personal profile] conquersworlds 2015-03-11 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
There's not much point in doing that, though - if people need to die then so be it.

(no subject)

[personal profile] conquersworlds - 2015-03-11 03:59 (UTC) - Expand